Volume 7, Issue 3 (Summer 2021)                   Iran J Neurosurg 2021, 7(3): 147-152 | Back to browse issues page


XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Rahimizadeh A, Malekmohammadi Z, Amirzadeh M, Rahimizadeh S. Retained Lumbar Intradiscal Surgical Knife Blade Retrieved Via Extended Extraforaminal Approach: Case Report and Review. Iran J Neurosurg 2021; 7 (3) :147-152
URL: http://irjns.org/article-1-267-en.html
1- Pars Advanced and Minimally Invasive Medical Manners Research Center, Pars Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , a_rahimizadeh@hotmail.com
2- Pars Advanced and Minimally Invasive Medical Manners Research Center, Pars Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Full Text [PDF 658 kb]   (519 Downloads)    
Full Text:   (681 Views)
1. Background and Importance
For the retrieval of lumbar intradiscal retained surgical instruments including the knife blade being presently addressed; the retroperitoneal corridor has remained the most preferred route for about the last two decades. More recently the extraforaminal and transforaminal routes were introduced [1, 2, 3, 4]. Within the present time there are still a few more corridors and techniques being described [5, 6].
Herein, a young man with an intradiscal retained broken surgical scalpel is presented in whom the foreign body was removed via the extended extraforaminal route. The approach described in the current case provides a practical solution through which the broken blade might be discovered and retrieved in the future with much greater ease.

2. Case Presentation
A 23-year-old man was referred to our hospital after unsuccessful attempts for the retrieval of an intradiscal retained broken surgical knife blade. The incident that resulted in its being lodged had occurred during an L4-L5 discectomy two days earlier.
The location of the broken blade could be suspected with the only available AP (anteroposterior) lumbar plane radiograph (Figure 1).
However, the exact location of the shattered instrument could be clearly demonstrated within 3-D reconstructed computerized tomography scans (Figure 2).

Surgical intervention
The original incision was reopened, then by drilling the upper part of the cranial facet of L5 and by the retraction of the L4 root; the roof and uppermost part of lateral wall of the L4-L5 annulus were excised. This provided a large scene through which sufficient exposure to the remaining contents of the disc space and the broken knife blade located at the anterolateral part of the disc space could easily be determined. Subsequently, the broken blade was grasped and extracted (Figure 3).
The postoperative course was uneventful and he was discharged a day later. 

3. Discussion
The literature concerning the breakage of a surgical knife blade during a lumbar discectomy is scarce. Since its first description in 1994, a total number of 14 cases including the current case have been published (Table 1).

It is important to note that there should have been plenty of cases with this iatrogenic complication which were never reported with respect to medicolegal implications. 
A retained broken blade may remain stable and clinically silent. However, with ambulation, it usually has a tendency to migrate anteriorly toward the retroperitoneal cavity. This will inevitably lead to serious complications [1, 7]. Migration of the broken blade into the pelvic cavity and penetration of the vena cava or its still further movement toward the left atrium are rather apt examples of the deadly hazards of a possible migration scenario [8, 9]. 
Removal of a retained broken surgical knife blade is an admittedly challenging issue. Despite a variety of approaches and different corridors which have been proposed; there are no unique guidelines to properly address the management of this complication. For years the retroperitoneal approach was accepted as the corridor of choice for this purpose. Then the more suitable extraforaminal approach was described in 2013 [1, 2]. Later, the transforaminal approach with pars removal was introduced for its relative ease of extraction. Recently, Zheng and Wang were able to remove a broken blade with arthroscopic assistance [6]. The extended extraforaminal approach which was utilized in the current case provides a large visual field which might obviate the necessity of a pars removal as well as the offending instrumentation (Figure 4).
In 2021, Barbero-Aznarez et al. successfully employed the paravertebral transposition approach for this purpose [10]. We believe that in the majority of cases, with consideration given for the familiarity of the neurosurgeons; the broken blade can nearly always be retrieved via one of these posterior corridors. Apparently, a posterior approach via an initial incision is psychologically better accepted by the patients and his/her relatives. However, if most of the broken blade traverses through the anterior longitudinal ligament or is lodged entirely out of the disc space, then its retrieval via a conventional retroperitoneal approach will be required [1, 7]. Recently, laparoscopic approach and robot-assisted laparoscopy have been described as alternative options [11, 12].

4. Conclusion 
With consideration of the potential hazards of an intradiscal broken scalpel, its removal either in the initial or within a subsequent surgical session is medically mandatory. The extended extraforaminal route might be safest as well as the easiest modified corridor for all intradiscal retained foreign bodies including a broken blade.

Ethical Considerations
Compliance with ethical guidelines

Written consent was obtained from the patient to publish the history and her corresponding radiological images.

Funding
This research did not receive any grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or non-profit sectors. 

Authors' contributions
Conception and design: Abolfazl Rahimizadeh, Zahed Malekmohammdai; Data collection: Abolfazl Rahimizadeh, Zahed Malekmohammdai, Mahan Amirzadeh; Data analysis and interpretation: Abolfazl Rahimizadeh, Shaghayegh Rahimizadeh; Drafting the article: Abolfazl Rahimizadeh, Mahan Amirzadeh; Critically revising the article: Shaghayegh Rahimizadeh, Walter Williamson; Reviewing submitted version of manuscript: Abolfazl Rahimizadeh, Zahed Malekmohammdai; Approving the final version of the manuscript: Abolfazl Rahimizadeh, Walter Williamson.

Conflict of interest
The authors declared no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgements
The authors would like to offer their special thanks to Dr. Naser Asgari for his useful comments.


References
  1. Amirjamshidi A, Mehrazin M, Abbassioun K, Ketabtchi E. Retained broken knife blades within the disc space. Spine. 1994; 19(8):981-4. [DOI:10.1097/00007632-199404150-00018] [PMID]
  2. Rahimizadeh A, Ghorbani E, Rahimizadeh S. Transforaminal retrieval of intradiscal retained broken surgical knife blade. Spine. 2013; 38(20):E1278-81. [DOI:10.1097/BRS.0b013e31829ef4d7] [PMID]
  3. Rahimizadeh A, Haddadi K. Is transforaminal retrieval of intradiscal deeply seated broken surgical knife blade all time pars sparing? A case report. International Journal of Surgery Case Reports. 2016; 19:131-3. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijscr.2015.12.040] [PMID] [PMCID]
  4. Rahimizadeh A, Rahimizadeh S, Amirzadeh M. Intradiscal retained broken blade of A disc rongeur. Journal of Spine & Neurosurgery. 2017; 6(3):1-3. [DOI:10.4172/2325-9701.1000273]
  5. Agrawal Y, Sharma S, Chopra S, Purohit DK. Retrieval of a retained broken scalpel blade from lumbar intervertebral disc space: A case report. Romanian Neurosurgery. 2017; 31(1):129-32. [DOI:10.1515/romneu-2017-0020]
  6. Zheng G bin, Wang Z. Removal of the deeply located intradiskal broken knife blade with arthroscopic assistance: Case report and literature Review. World Neurosurgery. 2020; 137:272-5. [DOI:10.1016/j.wneu.2020.01.221] [PMID]
  7. Wu C, Wu MH, Lee CY, Li YY, Huang, TJ. Retrieval of a broken surgical scalpel blade with a dangerous anterior migration in treating a herniated disk along with an osteophyte: A case report. Formosan Journal of Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2020; 11(3):123-7. [DOI:10.6492/FJMD.202008_11(3).0005]
  8. Li H, Wang W, He A. [A broken sharp scalpel left in an intervertebral space and slipped to pelvic cavity during an operation of intervertebral disc displacement (Chinese)]. Hunan yi ke da xue xue bao. 1998; 23(6):614. [PMID]
  9. De Praetere H, Vanden Eycken C, Meuris B, Herijgers P. Migration of a broken scalpel into the heart after spine surgery. Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery. 2014; 18(4):527-9. [DOI:10.1093/icvts/ivt553] [PMID] [PMCID]
  10. Barbero-Aznarez P, Bucheli-Peñafiel C, Olmos-Francisco E, Lorente-Muñoz A, Cortés-Franco S. Broken surgical blade retrieval following lumbar discectomy through paravertebral/lateral transpsoas approach: A case report. Surgical Neurology International. 2021; 12:25. [DOI:10.25259/SNI_880_2020] [PMID] [PMCID]
  11. Limbachia D, Gandhi P. Laparoscopic retrieval of a foreign body (broken surgical knife) from retroperitoneal space: An interesting case. Gynecology and Minimally Invasive Therapy. 2017; 6(4):193-4. [DOI:10.1016/j.gmit.2016.10.003] [PMID] [PMCID]
  12. Koutserimpas C, Ioannidis A, Konstantinidis M, Athanasopoulos P, Antonakopoulos F, Konstantinidis K. Robot-assisted removal of a broken scalpel blade following discectomy. Case Reports in Surgery. 2019; 2019:8609246. [DOI:10.1155/2019/8609246] [PMID] [PMCID]
Type of Study: Case report | Subject: Spine

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and Permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Iranian Journal of Neurosurgery

Designed & Developed by: Yektaweb