Volume 1, Issue 3 (12-2015)                   Iran J Neurosurg 2015, 1(3): 21-25 | Back to browse issues page


XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Canton Kessely Y, Tine I, Gaye Sakho M, Mbaye M, Ali Meidal M, Traore Y, et al . Diagnostic and Therapeutic Implications of Conjoined Nerve Root Anomalies: A Senegalese Study of Three Cases. Iran J Neurosurg. 2015; 1 (3) :21-25
URL: http://irjns.org/article-1-20-en.html
Abstract:   (1678 Views)

Background & Aim: Conjoined nerve root is defined as two adjacent nerve roots that share a common dural envelope at some points during their course from the thecal sac. This study reports our experience of conjoined roots involving three cases in Dakar.

Methods & Materials/Patients: This is a consecutive study from 2013 to 2015 involving patients supported for disc herniation and who have presented conjoined nerve root anomalie s.

Results: Three patients aged 32, 35 and 55 including two men have been concerned. Clinical analysis was done on sciatica with neuropathic occurrences in one case and lumbosciatica in two cases. The Lasegue sign was present in two patients at 45°. All three patients benefited a lumbar computerized tomography (CT scan) highlighting a degenerative disc disease with two in L5S1 space and one in L4L5 space. The imaging has not objectified radicular emerging anomalies. MRI objectified only one big root. A surgical root decompression was realized through interlaminar discectomy approach; foraminotomy and full laminectomy enabling diagnosis in intraoperative period. The evolution was favourable in all three cases with full recession of sympto matology.

Conclusion: This study is the first Senegalese series on the lumbo-sciatica by anomaly of root emergence and highlights especially the difficulties for the diagnosis of these anomalies like other sub-Saharan African countries where expansion of MRI for the diagnosis is low, and still very expensive. MRI provides guidance signs and a large root appearance can warn about the existence of these anomalies. A good root release improves the symptoms.  

Full Text [PDF 506 kb]   (950 Downloads) |   |   Full Text (HTML)  (76 Views)  
Type of Study: Case report | Subject: Gamma Knife Radiosurgery
* Corresponding Author Address: * Corresponding Author Address: Neurosurgery Department, Grand-Yoff Hospital, Dakar, Senegal. Tel: 00 221774451378, E-mail: canton_kessely@yahoo.fr

References
1. Lotan R, Al-Rashdi A, Yee A, Finkelstein J. Clinical features of conjoined lumbosacral nerve roots versus lumbar intervertebral disc herniations. Eur Spine J. 2010; 19: 1094–1098. [DOI:10.1007/s00586-010-1329-6] [PMID] [PMCID]
2. Zagnoni C. Reperto di un tipo non conosciuto di anastomosi nervosa delle radici spinali. Atti Soc Med Chir Padova 1949 27:48–52.
3. Taghipour M, Razmkon A, Hosseini K. Conjoined Lumbosacral Nerve Roots Analysis of Cases Diagnosed Intraoperatively. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2009; 22: 413–416. [DOI:10.1097/BSD.0b013e31818f00a0] [PMID]
4. White JG III, Strait TA, Binkley JR, Hunter SE. Surgical treatment of 63 cases of conjoined nerve roots. J Neurosurg 1982; 56: 114–7. [DOI:10.3171/jns.1982.56.1.0114] [PMID]
5. Postacchini F, Urso S, Ferro L. Lumbosacral nerve root anomalies. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1982; 64: 721–9. [DOI:10.2106/00004623-198264050-00009] [PMID]
6. Kadish LJ, Simmons EH. Anomalies of the lumbosacral nerve roots. An anatomical investigation and myelographic study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1984; 66: 411–6. [DOI:10.1302/0301-620X.66B3.6725353] [PMID]
7. Trimba R, Jeffrey M. Spivak, John A. Bendo. Conjoined nerve roots of the lumbar spine. The Spine Journal 12 (2012) 515–524. [DOI:10.1016/j.spinee.2012.06.004] [PMID]
8. Helms CA, Dorwart RH, Gray M. The CT appearance of conjoined nerve roots and differentiation from a herniated nucleus pulposus. Radiology 1982; 144: 803–7. [DOI:10.1148/radiology.144.4.7111728] [PMID]
9. Phillips LH II, Sung PT. The frequency of intradural conjoined lumbosacral dorsal nerve roots found during selective dorsal rhizotomy. Neurosurgery 1993;31: 88–91 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006123-199307000-00013 [DOI:10.1227/00006123-199307000-00013]
10. Scuderi GJ, Vaccaro AR, Brusovanik GV & al. Conjoined lumbar nerve roots: a frequently underappreciated congenital abnormality. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2004; 17(2) :86-93. [DOI:10.1097/00024720-200404000-00002] [PMID]
11. Bouchard JM, Copty M, Langelier R. Preoperative diagnosis of conjoined roots anomaly with herniated lumbar discs. Surg Neurol 1978; 10: 229–31. [PMID]
12. Decq P, Bokombe D, Nguyen Jp, Djindjian M, Molina P, Colin H, et al. Sciatique et anomalies d'émergence radiculaire : à propos d'une série de 20 cas. Neurochir. 1989; 35: 371–6.
13. Younes M, Korbaa W, Zrour S, Bejia I, Touzi M, Bergaoui N. Lombosciatique de causes inhabituelles: kystes de Tarlov et anomalies des racines nerveuses. Revue neurologique. 2009; 165: 282-287. [DOI:10.1016/j.neurol.2008.07.019] [PMID]
14. Kadish LJ, Simmons EH. Anomalies of the lumbosacral nerve roots. An anatomical investigation and myelographic study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1984; 66: 411–6. [DOI:10.1302/0301-620X.66B3.6725353] [PMID]
15. Artico M, Carloia S, Piacentini M et al. Conjoined lumbosacral nerve roots: observations on three cases and review of the literature. Neurocirugía 2006; 17: 54-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1130-1473(06)70370-0 [DOI:10.4321/S1130-14732006000100007]
16. Jeffrey LS, Richard AB, Robert EB and Richard HR. Surgical management of sciatica involving anomalous lumbar nerve roots. Journal of spine disorders 1988 1(2) 111-115.
17. Song SJ, Lee JW, Choi JY, et al. Imaging features suggestive of a conjoined nerve root on routine axial MRI. Skeletal Radiol 2008; 37: 133–8. [DOI:10.1007/s00256-007-0403-6] [PMID]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA code

© 2018 All Rights Reserved | Iranian Journal of Neurosurgery

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb