Volume 11 - Continuous Publishing                   Iran J Neurosurg 2025, 11 - Continuous Publishing: 0-0 | Back to browse issues page

Ethics code: 23/452

XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Rajkumar P, Subramanian T, Duraisamy J, Shankar Komarraju A. Retrospective Analysis of two different Cranioplasty Methods : A Single Institution Experience. Iran J Neurosurg 2025; 11 : 20
URL: http://irjns.org/article-1-467-en.html
1- Department of Neurosurgery, PSG Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Coimbatore, India.
2- Department of Neurosurgery, PSG Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Coimbatore, India. , jayaprakashduraisamy@yahoo.com
Abstract:   (41 Views)
Background and Importance: Decompressive craniectomy is an emergency neurosurgical procedure to reduce intracranial hypertension. Cranioplasty is an elective neurosurgical procedure to reconstruct the skull defect due to decompressive craniectomy. This study aims to review two different types of cranioplasty and comparecomputer-designed patientspecific titanium implant cranioplasty against titanium mesh with polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) cranioplasty, regardingtheir complications and outcomes after the procedure.
Case Presentation: This is a retrospective analysis of 150 patients who had undergone cranioplasty in PSG Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Coimbatore, India from January 2014 to January 2023. A total of 46 patients underwent cranioplasty with a computerdesigned, patient-specific titanium implant, and 104 patients underwent cranioplasty with a titanium mesh and PMMA implant. The parameters compared between the two procedures included the timing of surgery, cosmetic satisfaction, duration of hospital stay, wound infection, wound gaping, implant exposure, and necessity of implant removal.
Conclusion: Even though both procedures protect brain parenchyma from injuries due to direct trauma, patient-specific implant cranioplasty yielded shorter operating time, less wound infection, smaller wound gaping, reduced implant exposure, and better cosmetic appearance when compared with titanium mesh with PMMA implant cranioplasty.
Article number: 20
Full Text [PDF 975 kb]   (13 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Case Series | Subject: Basic Neurosurgery

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and Permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2026 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Iranian Journal of Neurosurgery

Designed & Developed by: Yektaweb