Volume 8, Issue 1 (Continuous publishing 2022)                   Iran J Neurosurg 2022, 8(1): 0-0 | Back to browse issues page


XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Sharifi G, Kalani N, Kazemi A, Kazeminezhad A. Neurosurgery Practice During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Iran J Neurosurg 2022; 8 (1) : 3
URL: http://irjns.org/article-1-286-en.html
1- Professor of Neurosurgery, Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Skull Base Research Center, Loghman Hakim Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Management Research Center, Jahrom University of Medical Sciences, Jahrom, Iran
3- Faculty Member, Jahrom University of Medical Sciences, Medical School, Department of Bacteriology and Virology, Jahrom, Iran
4- Department of Neurosurgery, Peymanieh Hospital, Trauma Research Center, Jahrom University of Medical Sciences, Jahrom, Iran , kazemimd@msn.com
Full Text [PDF 828 kb]   (744 Downloads)     |   Abstract (HTML)  (2305 Views)
Full Text:   (1053 Views)
1. Introduction 
The novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a viral infectious disease that has been occurred by the viral agent of the severe acute respiratory distress syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), with the presentation of pneumonia in these patients and only 11% of these patients need acute medical care and management. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) detects the viral RNA and does not mean the presence of intact infectious viral particles. The complete assembled virus is crucial for COVID-19 transmission. Human airway epithelial cells shed this virus and at present, only in secretions of these cells and in feces specimens, the live virus is detected [12], without any evidence of the fully assembled virus in the blood, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and central nervous system(CNS) [3, 45]. The survival time of SARS-COV-2 virions out of the body of a contaminated host is about 1.1 h in aerosols, 3.5 h on cardboard, 5.6 h on stainless steel, and 6.8 h on plastic [6]. There are two major routes for SARS-COV-2 transmission direct and indirect. Direct routes are contact (e.g., kissing an infected individual) or droplets (e.g., inhaling virion-containing aerosols immediately after an infected patient coughed, sneezed, or talked). 
Indirect routes are fomites (such as touching a contaminated surface and then touching one’s mouth or nose) or via an airborne transmission (such as aerosolization of virions during medical procedures). At present, respiratory and possibly fecal-oral routes are the main routes of SARS-COV-2 transmission [7] without any evidence of blood transmission and some reports of transmission from the mother to her fetus during pregnancy [8, 9]. For prevention of these mentioned perioperative nosocomial spreading of SARS-C0V-2, there are different general routines and strategies in most hospitals. Every center has its special strategies against COVID-19 and it is important that all staff be aware of these strategies [10]. 
Neurosurgeons are not prime in COVID-19 management but they continue caring for critically ill neurosurgical patients [11]. Because of direct contact during surgery between neurosurgeons and their patients, all neurosurgeons and surgical teams must be protected from contracting COVID-19. One of the hypothetical features of SARS-COV-2 is neurotropism of this virus, which is important from a neurosurgical viewpoint [12, 13]. First of all, SARS-COV-2 infects the olfactory bulb neurons and then reaches the CNS trans-synaptically. COVID-19 can cause anosmia and dysgeusia even in the absence of other respiratory manifestations [1415]. In neurosurgical practice, there are three high-risk conditions in the operation room: during anesthesia for endotracheal intubation and extubation, during surgeries in the vicinity of the sinuses and/or mastoid or injury to respiratory or digestive tarts during operation, and with the usage of aerosol-generating instruments in virion-contaminated tissues. With consideration of these high-risk conditions, we can optimize our routines, procedures, and approaches and finally decrease the risk of SARS-COV-2 transmission.
2. Methods and Materials/Patients 
For evidence acquisition and to provide new information, we concisely reviewed the effects of COVID-19 infection on neurosurgery. Using the keywords of SARS-COV2, Neurosurgery, and COVID-19, all the relevant articles (about 52 articles) since the beginning of COVID-19 were retrieved from Google Scholar, Medline, and PubMed, reviewed, and critically analyzed.
3. Results 
While neurosurgeons are not prime in the COVID-19 research, prevention, and management, they can prevent nosocomial transmission and infection of neurosurgical patients and medical personnel. For acquiring this fact, we can change some neurosurgical approaches, procedures, and routines based on our present knowledge of SARS-COV-2 biology and transmission, and consideration of high-risk neurosurgical settings for COVID-19.
4. Discussion 
Prevention of perioperative COVID-19 spreading
In most hospitals, there are some general measures for the prevention of pre-operative SARS-COV-2 transmission. One of the most comprehensive reports of such policies comes from a large tertiary hospital in Singapore [16]. Every hospital has its own strategy for the prevention of COVID-19 transmission but for the effectiveness of these strategies, all personnel must be familiar with these strategies. Following general protocols can prevent perioperative nosocomial spreading [16]:
1-Hospital strategies: decreased elective activities, searching for COVID-19 in patients, visitors, and medical personnel, and the presence of effective imparting of information’s with personnel 
2-Operation room (OR) strategies: We can consider a specific OR and anesthetic personnel for COVID-19 patients, and make a new plan in OR workflows for COVID-19 patients
3-Anesthesia policies: formal training sessions on protective equipment usage, each hospital must have its own personnel without shared personnel, postponement of all elective preoperative visits, and prohibition of visiting and caring for COVID-19 cases by pregnant or immunocompromised personnel 
4-Protective equipment: There are three groups of patients and conditions for protective equipment as follows:
-Low-risk patients (asymptomatic and no history of travel or contact with COVID-19 patient): surgical masks and droplet precautions
-High-risk patients and COVID-19 patients: N95 masks, eye protection, gown, and single and/or double gloves
-When performing aerosol-generating procedures on COVID-19 patients, we must use a powered air-purifying respirator
5-Specific strategies: during patient transport, all patients must wear a surgical mask, patients should be transported in a special route for COVID-19 patients to OR or other parts of the hospital, we can consider a special OR for COVID-19 patients and keep it empty as much as possible and every time need drugs and/or equipment, take them to especial OR, preferably preparing single-use equipment for especial OR, not taking charts into the COVID-19 OR, covering all monitors, computers, and machines in plastic wrap, performing the patient review, induction, and recovery within the single OR to limit contamination to a single room, and decreasing the number and movement of personnel in the OR
6-Operation room sterilization after the operation of a patient with COVID-19: all disposable parts of the anesthetic breathing circuit that were in contact with the patient’s breathing must be discarded, including the soda lime canister, all contact surfaces must be cleaned with quaternary ammonium chloride disinfectant wipes, for OR disinfection, it must be cleaned with sodium hypochlorite 1000 ppm and then with hydrogen peroxide vaporization or ultraviolet C irradiation, and after each COVID-19 case operation, all staff should shower and change new scrubs
Neurosurgery-related risks of COVID-19
In neurosurgery, the risk of SARS-COV-2 transmission under three following conditions is high and we must optimize our procedures to decrease the risk: during endotracheal intubation and extubation, during operations in proximity to sinuses and/or mastoid or injury to respiratory and/or digestive tract during operation, and usage of aerosol-generating instruments in virion-contaminated tissues.
Risks Related to Anesthesia Techniques and Procedures
There is a significant risk of respiratory transmission of SARS-COV-2 among healthcare workers with anesthesia techniques and procedures because of airway manipulation. These anesthesia techniques and procedures are endotracheal intubation, tracheotomy, noninvasive ventilation, and manual ventilation before intubation with the greatest risk of transmission with endotracheal intubation [17]. Guidelines for the management of the airway in COVID-19 patients can help anesthesiologists to decrease and/or eliminate this risk as much as possible [181920]. From a neurosurgical viewpoint, it is better to replace general anesthesia and endotracheal intubation with alternative anesthesia methods and techniques as much as possible. In neurosurgery, for many procedures, we can replace GA with conscious sedation, local anesthesia, and/or spinal anesthesia with the patient wearing a face mask to limit aerosolization in the OR. In the following instances, we can replace general anesthesia: external ventricular drain (EVD) placement, chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) evacuation [21], carotid endarterectomy [22], and lumbar discectomy or laminectomy [2324]. If GA is obligatory, we must decrease the number of personnel, including most neurosurgeons in OR during intubation and extubation. Any anesthesia technique and procedure that may induce cough must be prohibited, like awake fiberoptic intubation [25].
Risks related to neurosurgical procedures
For neurosurgeons, the risk of SARS-COV-2 transmission increases during surgical approaches in the vicinity of the sinuses or mastoids: trans-sphenoidal approaches, trans mastoid approaches, transoral approaches, percutaneous trigeminal rhizotomies as well as craniotomies involving the frontal sinuses, such as bicoronal, bifrontal craniotomies or frontal skull fracture repair. For COVID-19 positive patients or in a local outbreak, all of these approaches, if possible, must be delayed or replaced with alternative following approaches :
-Trans-sphenoidal surgeries: Most of these cases are nonurgent and can be postponed. However, in cases that need an urgent operation, pituitary apoplexy or craniopharyngioma with obstructive hydrocephalus transcranial approach (e.g., pterional) or an alternative strategy (e.g., a cystic craniopharyngioma could be drained through stereotactic implantation of an Omaya reservoir and treated using intracavitary therapies rather than trans-sphenoidal resection) must be replaced. 
-Retro sigmoid craniotomy: Because of the vicinity of this approach to the mastoid, it is better to replace it with translabyrintine approach for vestibular schwannomas.
-In all conditions, while carrying out craniotomy, avoidance from frontal sinuses or mastoid air cells must be considered, which can be facilitated by the use of neuronavigation. Nonoperative treatment or lumbar drainage can be considered in COVID-19 patients with frontal sinus fractures until the COVID-19 status is negative. 
-In patients with trigeminal neuralgia that are resistant to drug therapy, it is better to consider radiosurgery over rhizotomy. 
-Transthoracic surgeries in spinal tumors or trauma must be replaced with dorsal approaches. 
If the patient’s safety or surgical outcome is compromised with changing in surgical policy, we cannot modify surgical strategy and in these circumstances that exposure to the respiratory tract is unavoidable, first of all, the COVID-19-positive patients must be decolonized. For decolonization of these patients, standard chlorhexidine skin preparation, intranasal povidone-iodine preparation (especially in end nasal approaches), and chlorhexidine or hydrogen peroxide mouth rinse have should be used; however, the efficacy of this approach remains unproven. Theoretically, gastrointestinal tract involvement during operation, as a rare esophageal injury with mucosal erosion during the anterior approach to the cervical spine with anterior instrumentation or bowel perforation during ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt placement, can increase the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection. For decreasing the risk of COVID-19 transmission in these conditions, we can do the following measures: first of all, we must prevent these complications during operations and if occur, we must increase precautions for prevention of COVID-19 infection with the increased level of PPE and decontamination, for VP shunt placement, it is better to dissect under direct vision versus blind trocar insertion, and consider endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) in place of VP shunt every time is possible [26, 27].
Risks of usage of the Aerosol-Generating Instruments on Virion-Containing Tissues
Usage of aerosol-generating instruments is the most common but highly theoretical risk for airborne transmission of SARS-COV-2 for neurosurgeons. These aerosol generating instruments are all powered drills [17, 2829], electrocautery [17, 28, 30], lasers [31], ultrasonic aspirators [32] as well as insufflators used for pneumoperitoneum maintenance during laparoscopic surgery [33]. These aerosolized particles if contain complete assembled virions are infectious as definitely occur in the respiratory and digestive tracts. However, there is no conclusive stud on the presence of these assembled complete virions in CSF, CNS tissue, and bone, while the clinical significance of aerosolized blood remains uncertain. In about 10% to 40% of COVID-19 patients, SARS-COV-2 RNA can be isolated from the blood [34, 353637], but this does not mean the presence of complete viral particles. Because of the avoidance of the aerosol-generating instruments, if surgically possible, it is very important to consider the following conditions:
1) COVID-19-positive patients 
2) If there is the local nosocomial spreading of COVID-19 with an unknown source
3) During surgical approaches in the vicinity of sinuses or mastoid
In all of these conditions, it is better to use rongeurs and curettes in instead of drilling with a burr. Using a Hudson brace or a twist drill instead of a perforator for making burr holes, especially in conditions that a single hole is sufficient, like EVD placement or CSDH, is safer [383940]. Using rongeurs and chisels in place of high-speed drilling in transsphenoidal operation is safer. In spinal decompression and stabilization, we can use various Kerrison punch rongeurs for bony removal instead of drilling, and manual, tactile pedicle probes are suggested to facilitate the placement of pedicle screws. If drilling during operation is obligatory, it must be used at a lower speed and drilling should be stopped during irrigationand large suctions should be used to aspirate as much particulate matter as possible and shield the drilling area with a transparent adhesive film “tent” or gauzes. In spinal operations, for decreasing the usage of drilling navigation, minimally invasive techniques, such as endoscopic procedures and percutaneous screws should be considered. During electrocautery, the smoke must be suctioned as soon as possible. Decreased usage of lasers and ultrasonic aspirators must be considered. For the prevention of the aerosolization created by the carbon dioxide insufflators, VP shunt operation must be done open rather than laparoscopically [41]. Manipulation of aerosol-generating instruments must be prohibited by learners [36].
Preoperative Sars-Cov-2 testing
In patients without any symptoms and without any history of traveling or contact that operation is obligatory but not urgent, perioperative SARS-COV-2 testing must be considered. In COVID-19, about 17.9% are asymptomatic carriers; however, with this SARS-COV-2 testing, we can detect these persons and significantly reduce the nosocomial spreading and preserve the protective equipment supply [42, 43]. After doing preoperative SRAS-COV-2 testing, in infected patients, if possible, delaying the procedures until they are cured and in negative cases, decreasing the usage of protective equipment should be regarded. However, the false sense of certainty with a negative test can paradoxically increase nosocomial transmission and this caution must be considered until COVID-19 tests are standardized and their sensitivity and specificity are known at the local level for interpretation of negative test results. Therefore, in cases with high clinical suspicion of COVID-19 with negative test results, it is better to repeat the COVID-19 PCR assay [44] and secondly, these cases should be considered as infected. In the time interval between the testing and the operation, patients must be asked to take additional precautions (i.e., self-quarantine). At present, immune testing is not yet reliable [4546].
Important neurosurgical viewpoints during the COVID-19 pandemic [16, 47]
-Decreasing the number of operations as possible and only operating the patients that cannot postpone their operations
-Using an alternative surgical approach and technique with a lower risk for COVID-19 transmission if possible
-Decreasing the number of personnel in the OR to a minimum level if possible
-It is better not to involve observers, students, and even residents during the operation
-Increasing shifting time and decreasing breaking time to minimize personnel turnover
-It is better not to exchange and move neurosurgeons and personnel between hospitals
-If possible, consider a special neurosurgical team, including neurosurgeons, surgical technicians, and an anesthetic team for COVID-19 patients that will decrease contact with others
-If possible, consider preoperative SARS-COV-2 testing for all surgical patients
Neurosurgical Procedure Optimization [16, 47]
1- Replacing general anesthesia with awake surgeries with facemask and if intubation is necessary, decrease the number of personnel to a minimum level during induction of anesthesia and for intubation, use neuromuscular blockers to prevent cough.
2- Replacing surgical approaches in proximity to the sinuses and mastoids with alternative approaches if possible. In patients that need operation with exposure of the nasal or oral mucosa, it is better to decolonize them before operation with intranasal povidone-iodine preparation (especially in endonasal approaches) and chlorhexidine or hydrogen peroxide mouth rinse and avoid postoperative nasal endoscopy and nasal sprays if possible.
3- Decreasing the usage of aerosol-generating instruments during the operation as follows:
-it is better to replace drills with rongeurs, curettes, or chisels instead of burrs if possible
-for making burr holes, replace perforator with a twist drill and use a Hudson brace
-in spinal operation, replace burr with rongeurs and use manual, tactile pedicle probes to facilitate the placement of pedicle screws
-Not doing unneeded electrocautery and keep away from lasers usage and ultrasonic aspirators
-it is better to do a VP shunt operation open under direct vision and dissection rather than laparoscopically
-it is better to isolate the surgical field with towels during hammering to decrease aerosolization and irrigate with large volumes at low pressure rather than low volumes at high pressure
4- For drilling, consider the following tips:
-drilling must be done at a lower speed
-when irrigation is done, stop drilling
-for aspiration of all airborne particles, use large powerful suction
-for isolation of the drilling area, use a transparent adherent film, tent, or gauzes
-in spine procedures and operations, decrease drilling as possible by using navigation and considering minimally invasive approaches, such as endoscopic procedures and percutaneous instrumentation
The most controversial aspect of the above items is decreased usage of aerosol-generating instruments because the transmission of a respiratory virus with inhalation of lumbar spine dust is contrary to common sense expectations. Because for the occurrence of this virion-contaminated blood or CSF, the bone dust must be aerosolized, which has never been proven, neither for SARS-CoV-2 nor for SARS-CoV [48].
5. Conclusion 
For prevention of COVID-19 transmission, we must change routine neurosurgical protocols without affecting neurosurgical outcomes and harming the neurosurgical patients. High-risk neurosurgical settings must be considered and with correct optimization of these settings, we can decrease the risk of COVID-19 transmission. For more clarification of the COVID-19 role in neurosurgery, more conclusive studies are needed and this narrative study is a starting point for future detailed conclusive studies.

Ethical Considerations
Compliance with ethical guidelines

There were no ethical considerations to be considered in this research.

Funding
This research did not receive any grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or non-profit sectors. 

Authors' contributions
Conception and design: Guive Sharifi, Ali kazeminezhad; Data analysis and interpretation: Guive Sharifi, Navid Kalani, Akbar Kazemi, Ali Kazeminezhad; Drafting of the article: Guive Sharifi, Navid Kalani, Akbar Kazemi, and Ali Kazeminezhad; Critical revision: Guive Sharifi, Navid Kalani, Akbar Kazemi, and Ali Kazeminezhad; Reviewing the submitted version of the manuscript: Guive Sharifi, Navid Kalani, Akbar Kazemi, and Ali Kazeminezhad; Approving the final version of the manuscript: Guive Sharifi, Navid Kalani, Akbar Kazemi, and Ali Kazeminezhad; Data Collection: Data Analysis and Interpretation: Guive Sharifi, Navid Kalani, Akbar Kazemi, and Ali Kazeminezhad; Drafting of the article: Guive Sharifi, Navid Kalani, Akbar Kazemi, and Ali Kazeminezhad.

Conflict of interest
The authors declared no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments
We would like to thank the Clinical Research Development Unit of Peymanieh Educational and Research and Therapeutic Center of Jahrom University of Medical Sciences for providing facilities for this work.


References
  1. Zhu N, Zhang D, Wang W, Li X, Yang B, Song J, et al. A novel coronavirus from patients with pneumonia in China, 2019. The New England journal of medicine. 2020; 382(8):727-33. [DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa2001017] [PMID] [PMCID]
  2. Wang W, Xu Y, Gao R, Lu R, Han K, Wu G, et al. Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in different types of clinical specimens. JAMA. 2020; 323(18):1843-4. [DOI:10.1001/jama.2020.3786]
  3. Woo PC, Lau SK, Tsoi HW, Chan KH, Wong BH, Che XY, et al. Relative rates of non-pneumonic SARS coronavirus infection and SARS coronavirus pneumonia. Lancet. 2004; 363(9412):841-5. [DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(04)15729-2]
  4. Chang L, Yan Y, Wang L. Coronavirus disease 2019: Coronaviruses and blood safety. Transfusion Medicine Reviews. 2020; 34(2):75-80. [DOI:10.1016/j.tmrv.2020.02.003] [PMID] [PMCID]
  5. Netland J, Meyerholz DK, Moore S, Cassell M, Perlman S. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus infection causes neuronal death in the absence of encephalitis in mice transgenic for human ACE2. Journal of Virology. 2008; 82(15):7264-75. [DOI:10.1128/JVI.00737-08] [PMID] [PMCID]
  6. van Doremalen N, Bushmaker T, Morris DH, Holbrook MG, Gamble A, Williamson BN, et al. Aerosol and surface stability of SARS-CoV-2 as compared with SARS-CoV-1. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2020; 382(16):1564-7. [DOI:10.1056/NEJMc2004973] [PMID] [PMCID]
  7. Gu J, Han B, Wang J. COVID-19: Gastrointestinal manifestations and potential fecal-oral transmission. Gastroenterology. 2020; 158(6):1518-9. [DOI:10.1053/j.gastro.2020.02.054] [PMID] [PMCID]
  8. Dong L, Tian J, He S, Zhu C, Wang J, Liu C, et al. Possible vertical transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from an infected mother to her newborn. JAMA. 2020; 323(18):1846-8. [DOI:10.1001/jama.2020.4621] [PMID] [PMCID]
  9. Chen H, Guo J, Wang C, Luo F, Yu X, Zhang W, et al. Clinical characteristics and intrauterine vertical transmission potential of COVID-19 infection in nine pregnant women: A retrospective review of medical records. Lancet. 2020; 395(10226):809-15. [DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30360-3]
  10. Wong J, Goh QY, Tan Z, Lie SA, Tay YC, Ng SY, et al. Preparing for a COVID-19 pandemic: A review of operating room outbreak response measures in a large tertiary hospital in Singapore. Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia. 2020; 67(6):732-45. [PMID]
  11. Chinazzi M, Davis JT, Ajelli M, Gioannini C, Litvinova M, Merler S, et al. The effect of travel restrictions on the spread of the 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak. Science. 2020; 368(6489):395-400. [DOI:10.1126/science.aba9757] [PMID] [PMCID]
  12. Wilder-Smith A, Chiew CJ, Lee VJ. Can we contain the COVID-19 outbreak with the same measures as for SARS? The Lancet. Infectious Diseases. 2020; 20(5):e102-7. [DOI:10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30129-8]
  13. Baig AM, Khaleeq A, Ali U, Syeda H. Evidence of the COVID-19 virus targeting the CNS: Tissue distribution, host-virus interaction, and proposed neurotropic mechanisms. ACS Chemical Neuroscience. 2020; 11(7):994-8. [PMID] [PMCID]
  14. Li YC, Bai WZ, Hashikawa T. The neuroinvasive potential of SARS-CoV2 may play a role in the respiratory failure of COVID-19 patients. Journal of Medical Virology. 2020; 92(6):552-5. [DOI:10.1002/jmv.25728] [PMID] [PMCID]
  15. Hwang CS. Olfactory neuropathy in acute respiratory syndrome: Report of a case. Acta Neurologica Taiwanica. 2006; 15(1):26-8. [PMID]
  16. Iorio-Morin C, Hodaie M, Sarica C, Dea N, Westwick HJ, Christie SD, et al. Letter: The risk of COVID-19 infection during neurosurgical procedures: A review of severe acute respiratory distress syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) modes of transmission and proposed neurosurgery-specific measures for mitigation. Neurosurgery. 2020; 87(2):E178-85. [PMID]
  17. Zhou L, Zhang M, Wang J, Gao J. SARS-CoV-2: Underestimated damage to nervous system. Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease. 2020; 36:101642. [DOI:10.1016/j.tmaid.2020.101642] [PMID] [PMCID]
  18. Tran K, Cimon K, Severn M, Pessoa-Silva CL, Conly J. Aerosol generating procedures and risk of transmission of acute respiratory infections to healthcare workers: A systematic review. PLoS OnE. 2012; 7(4):e35797. [PMID]
  19. Cook TM, El-Boghdadly K, McGuire B, McNarry AF, Patel A, Higgs A. Consensus guidelines for managing the airway in patients with COVID-19: Guidelines from the Difficult Airway Society, the Association of Anaesthetists the Intensive Care Society, the Faculty of Intensive Care Medicine and the Royal College of Anaesthetists. Anaesthesia. 2020; 75(6):785-99. [PMID]
  20. Wax RS, Christian MD. Practical recommendations for critical care and anesthesiology teams caring for novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) patients. Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia. 2020; 67(5):568-76. [DOI:10.1007/s12630-020-01591-x] [PMID] [PMCID]
  21. Zhao S, Lin Q, Ran J, Musa SS, Yang G, Wang W, et al. Preliminary estimation of the basic reproduction number of novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) in China, from 2019 to 2020: A data-driven analysis in the early phase of the outbreak. International Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2020; 92:214-7. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijid.2020.01.050] [PMID] [PMCID]
  22. Surve RM, Bansal S, Reddy M, Philip M. Use of dexmedetomidine along with local infiltration versus general anesthesia for burr hole and evacuation of chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH). Journal of Neurosurgical Anesthesiology. 2017; 29(3):274-80. [DOI:10.1097/ANA.0000000000000305] [PMID]
  23. Harky A, Chan JSK, Kot TKM, Sanli D, Rahimli R, Belamaric Z, et al. General anesthesia versus local anesthesia in carotid endarterectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia. 2020; 34(1):219-34. [DOI:10.1053/j.jvca.2019.03.029] [PMID]
  24. Pierce JT, Kositratna G, Attiah MA, Kallan MJ, Koenigsberg R, Syre P, et al. Efficiency of spinal anesthesia versus general anesthesia for lumbar spinal surgery: A retrospective analysis of 544 patients. Local and Regional Anesthesia. 2017; 10:91-8. [DOI:10.2147/LRA.S141233] [PMID] [PMCID]
  25. Demirel CB, Kalayci M, Ozkocak I, Altunkaya H, Ozer Y, Acikgoz B. A prospective randomized study comparing perioperative outcome variables after epidural or general anesthesia for lumbar disc surgery. Journal of Neurosurgical Anesthesiology. 2003; 15(3):185-92. [DOI:10.1097/00008506-200307000-00005] [PMID]
  26. Peng PWH, Ho PL, Hota SS. Outbreak of a new coronavirus: What anaesthetists should know. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2020; 124(5):497-501. [DOI:10.1016/j.bja.2020.02.008] [PMID] [PMCID]
  27. Dexter F, Parra MC, Brown JR, Loftus RW. Perioperative COVID-19 defense: An evidence-based approach for optimization of infection control and operating room management. Anesthesia and Analgesia. 2020; 131(1):37-42. [DOI:10.1213/ANE.0000000000004829] [PMID] [PMCID]
  28. Jewett DL, Heinsohn P, Bennett C, Rosen A, Neuilly C. Blood-containing aerosols generated by surgical techniques: A possible infectious hazard. American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal. 1992; 53(4):228-31. [PMID]
  29. Küçükdurmaz F, İmren Y, Akkoyunlu Y, Tuncay İ, Şen C. Domestic electric drills in the service of orthopaedic surgery: A potential and preventable source of surgical site infections. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica. 2012; 46(6):455-9. [DOI:10.3944/AOTT.2012.2794] [PMID]
  30. Wenner L, Pauli U, Summermatter K, Gantenbein H, Vidondo B, Posthaus H. Aerosol generation during bone-sawing procedures in veterinary autopsies. Veterinary Pathology. 2017; 54(3):425-36. [DOI:10.1177/0300985816688744] [PMID]
  31. Barrett WL, Garber SM. Surgical smoke: A review of the literature. Is this just a lot of hot air? Surgical Endoscopy. 2003; 17(6):979-87. [DOI:10.1007/s00464-002-8584-5] [PMID]
  32. Pierce JS, Lacey SE, Lippert JF, Lopez R, Franke JE. Laser-generated air contaminants from medical laser applications: A state-of-the-science review of exposure characterization, health effects, and control. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene. 2011; 8(7):447-66. [PMID]
  33. Preston JK, Masciopinto J, Salamat MS, Badie B. Tumour cell dispersion by the ultrasonic aspirator during brain tumour resection. British Journal of Neurosurgery. 1999; 13(5):486-9. [PMID]
  34. Ikramuddin S, Lucus J, Ellison EC, Schirmer WJ, Melvin WS. Detection of aerosolized cells during carbon dioxide laparoscopy. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery. 1998; 2(6):580-4. [DOI:10.1016/S1091-255X(98)80060-7]
  35. Chan JF, Yuan S, Kok KH, To KK, Chu H, Yang J, et al. A familial cluster of pneumonia associated with the 2019 novel coronavirus indicating person-to-person transmission: A study of a family cluster. Lancet. 2020; 395(10223):514-23. [DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30154-9]
  36. Zhang W, Du RH, Li B, Zheng XS, Yang XL, Hu B, et al. Molecular and serological investigation of 2019-nCoV infected patients: Implication of multiple shedding routes. Emerging Microbes & Infections. 2020; 9(1):386-9. [PMID] [PMCID]
  37. Chen W, Lan Y, Yuan X, Deng X, Li Y, Cai X, et al. Detectable 2019-nCoV viral RNA in blood is a strong indicator for the further clinical severity. Emerging Microbes & Infections. 2020; 9(1):469-73. [PMID]
  38. Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, Ren L, Zhao J, Hu Y, et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet. 2020; 395(10223):497-506. [DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30183-5]
  39. Han HJ, Park CW, Kim EY, Yoo CJ, Kim YB, Kim WK. One vs. Two burr hole craniostomy in surgical treatment of chronic subdural hematoma. Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society. 2009; 46(2):87-92. [PMID] [PMCID]
  40. Gernsback J, Kolcun JP, Jagid J. To drain or two drains: Recurrences in chronic subdural hematomas. World Neurosurgery. 2016; 95:447-50 [DOI:10.1016/j.wneu.2016.08.069] [PMID]
  41. Heringer LC, Sousa UO, Oliveira MF, Nunes AS, Alves KA, Zancanaro ML, et al. The number of burr holes and use of a drain do not interfere with surgical results of chronic subdural hematomas. Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria. 2017; 75(11):809-12. [PMID]
  42. Tan YT, Wang JW, Zhao K, Han L, Zhang HQ, Niu HQ, et al. Preliminary recommendations for surgical practice of neurosurgery department in the central epidemic area of 2019 coronavirus infection. Current Medical Science. 2020; 40(2):281-4. [PMID]
  43. Mizumoto K, Kagaya K, Zarebski A, Chowell G. Estimating the asymptomatic proportion of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases on board the Diamond Princess cruise ship, Yokohama, Japan, 2020. Euro Surveillance. 2020; 25(10):2000180. [DOI:10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.10.2000180] [PMID] [PMCID]
  44. Livingston E, Desai A, Berkwits M. Sourcing personal protective equipment during the COVID-19 pandemic. JAMA. 2020; 323(19):1912-4. [DOI:10.1001/jama.2020.5317] [PMID]
  45. Li Y, Yao L, Li J, Chen L, Song Y, Cai Z, et al. Stability issues of RT-PCR testing of SARS-CoV-2 for hospitalized patients clinically diagnosed with COVID-19. Journal of Medical Virology. 2020; 92(7):903-8. [DOI:10.1002/jmv.25786] [PMID] [PMCID]
  46. Sheridan C. Fast, portable tests come online to curb coronavirus pandemic. Nature Biotechnology. 2020; 38(5):515-8. [PMID]
  47. Li Z, Yi Y, Luo X, Xiong N, Liu Y, Li S, et al. Development and clinical application of a rapid IgM-IgG combined antibody test for SARS-CoV-2 infection diagnosis. Journal of Medical Virology. 2020; 92(9):1518-24. [PMID]
  48. Ti LK, Ang LS, Foong TW, Ng BSW. What we do when a COVID-19 patient needs an operation: Operating room preparation and guidance. Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia. 2020; 67(6):756-8. [PMID]
Type of Study: Review | Subject: Basic Neurosurgery

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and Permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2025 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Iranian Journal of Neurosurgery

Designed & Developed by: Yektaweb