Sat, May 4, 2024
Volume 10 - Continuous Publishing
Iran J Neurosurg 2024, 10 - Continuous Publishing: 0-0 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Haddadi K, Tahmasbi N, Alaee A, Alipour A, Ehteshami S. Comparison of Vicious Effect of Oral Pantoprazole and
Famotidine on New Bone Formation in Patients With
Lumbar Spine Fusion Surgery: A Randomized Control Trial. Iran J Neurosurg 2024; 10 : 1
URL: http://irjns.org/article-1-366-en.html
URL: http://irjns.org/article-1-366-en.html
1- Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.
2- Orthopedics Research Center, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.
3- Orthopedics Research Center, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran. , paper87@yahoo.com
2- Orthopedics Research Center, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.
3- Orthopedics Research Center, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran. , paper87@yahoo.com
Abstract: (574 Views)
Background and Aim: Due to the increasing use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and their side effects for bone repair and the high percentage of therapy failure in lumbar fusion surgery, especially in various animal studies, the goal of this study was to appraise the consequence of pantoprazole and famotidine on new bone formation in patients experiencing spinal fusion surgery.
Methods and Materials/Patients: In this double-blind clinical trial, eighty patients participated based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, of whom 40 cases received pantoprazole (group P) and 40 received famotidine (group F) for eight weeks. They were followed up for three, six, and twelve months after surgery for cage subsidence, screw loosening, and visual analogue scale (VAS), Oswestry disability index (ODI), Brantigan, Steffee, Fraser (BSF), and Lenke classification for grading
their bone formation. A P<0.05 was considered significant.
Results: The rate of fusion based on the Lenke score was lower in the group receiving pantoprazole six and 12 months after the surgery compared to group F (the frequency of Lenke grades C and D were 35% and 25% compared to the famotidine group 12.5% and 12.5%, respectively; P=0.042). The VAS Mean±SD score in group F was lower than group P after 12 months (2.48±1.06 and 1.83±0.55, respectively; P=0.008). There was no pharmacologically significant association between subsidence (P=0.43), loosening (P=0.13), ODI (P=0.31), and BSF (P=0.77) 3, 6 and 12 months post-operation.
Conclusion: Affording to the preliminary conclusions of this study, the use of pump inhibitors, such as pantoprazole is more destructive for the ossification process in candidates for spinal fusion requiring the chronic use of drugs for controlling their gastric acid secretion, and H2-blocking drugs, such as famotidine are preferable in this situation after further investigations.
Methods and Materials/Patients: In this double-blind clinical trial, eighty patients participated based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, of whom 40 cases received pantoprazole (group P) and 40 received famotidine (group F) for eight weeks. They were followed up for three, six, and twelve months after surgery for cage subsidence, screw loosening, and visual analogue scale (VAS), Oswestry disability index (ODI), Brantigan, Steffee, Fraser (BSF), and Lenke classification for grading
their bone formation. A P<0.05 was considered significant.
Results: The rate of fusion based on the Lenke score was lower in the group receiving pantoprazole six and 12 months after the surgery compared to group F (the frequency of Lenke grades C and D were 35% and 25% compared to the famotidine group 12.5% and 12.5%, respectively; P=0.042). The VAS Mean±SD score in group F was lower than group P after 12 months (2.48±1.06 and 1.83±0.55, respectively; P=0.008). There was no pharmacologically significant association between subsidence (P=0.43), loosening (P=0.13), ODI (P=0.31), and BSF (P=0.77) 3, 6 and 12 months post-operation.
Conclusion: Affording to the preliminary conclusions of this study, the use of pump inhibitors, such as pantoprazole is more destructive for the ossification process in candidates for spinal fusion requiring the chronic use of drugs for controlling their gastric acid secretion, and H2-blocking drugs, such as famotidine are preferable in this situation after further investigations.
Article number: 1
Type of Study: Clinical Trial |
Subject:
Spine
Send email to the article author
| Rights and Permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
Articles Copyright © The Author(s).
Owned by Guilan University of Medical Sciences.
Co-published by Negah Institute for Scientific Communication.
Contact Information:
IrJNS Office, Guilan Road Trauma Research Center, Poursina Hospital, Namjoo St, Rasht, Guilan, Iran.
Publisher Tel : +9821 45355555 , 45355000
Email: ir.journalofneurosurgery@gmail.com, info@irjns.org
Owned by Guilan University of Medical Sciences.
Co-published by Negah Institute for Scientific Communication.
Contact Information:
IrJNS Office, Guilan Road Trauma Research Center, Poursina Hospital, Namjoo St, Rasht, Guilan, Iran.
Publisher Tel : +9821 45355555 , 45355000
Email: ir.journalofneurosurgery@gmail.com, info@irjns.org
