Volume 3, Issue 1 (6-2017)                   Iran J Neurosurg 2017, 3(1): 21-26 | Back to browse issues page

XML Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Bagheri S R, Alimohammadi E, Saeedi H, Sepehri P, Soleimani P, Fatahian R, et al . Decompressive Craniectomy in Traumatic Brain Injury:Factors Influencing Prognosis and Outcome. Iran J Neurosurg. 2017; 3 (1) :21-26
URL: http://irjns.org/article-1-70-en.html
1- assistant professor of neurosurgery, Kermanshah University Of Medical Science, Kermanshah, IRAN
2- assistant professor of neurosurgery, Kermanshah University Of Medical Science, Kermanshah, IRAN , hafez125@gmail.com
Abstract:   (6801 Views)

Background and Aim: Decompressive craniectomy can be life-saving for patients with severe traumatic brain injury, but many questions about its ideal application, indications, timing, technique, and even the definition of success of decompressive craniectomy remains unclear. The aim of this study was to assess the factors associated with prognosis and outcome of patients with traumatic brain injury who had undergone a rapid decompressive craniectomy.

Methods and Materials/Patients: We investigated 61 patients, who had undergone rapid decompressive craniectomy. The effect of variables including demographic features of patients, primary level of consciousness, pupil size and reactivity, and midline shift in patients' brain CT scan on outcome of patients were assessed.

Results: 61 patients (36 males and 25 females) underwent rapid surgical decompressive craniectomy within 4.5±2 hours after trauma. Mean age of patients was 36.09±15.89 years old (range: 16 to 68 years). Of 61 patients, 33 (54.1%) had favorable and 28 (45.9%) had unfavorable outcome. Patients with following conditions had significantly worse outcome; age older than 60 years, bilateral non-reactive mydriasis, critical head injury (GCS<5), midline shift more than 10 millimeters in their brain CT scan. GCS and age could predict the outcome of surgery more significantly than other variables, so that higher age predicted unfavorable outcome with 1.13 times, and in GCS<5 the probability of unfavorable outcome is about 192 times. Patients with midline shift more than 10 mm are 6.15 times more likely to have risk of unfavorable outcome than those with midline shift less than 10 mm.

Conclusion: In this study, we found that age more than 60 years and GCS less than five were associated with poor outcome. Patients with these conditions could not benefit much from early decompressive craniectomy.

Full Text [PDF 348 kb]   (2187 Downloads) |   |   Full Text (HTML)  (1404 Views)  
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Gamma Knife Radiosurgery

1. Bratton SL, Chestnut RM, Ghajar J, et al. Guidelines for the man- agement of severe traumatic brain injury. VI. Indications for intracra- nial pressure monitoring. J Neurotrauma.;24 Suppl 1:S37–44. 2007. [DOI:10.1089/neu.2007.9990] [PMID]
2. Leif-Erik Bohman L Schuster J Decompressive Craniectomy for Management of Traumatic Brain Injury: An Update Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 13:392, 2013. [DOI:10.1007/s11910-013-0392-x] [PMID]
3. Marshall LF, Smith RW, Shapiro HM. The outcome with aggressive treatment in severe head injuries. Part I: the significance of intracranial pressure monitoring. J Neurosurg.;50(1):20–5. 1979. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1979.50.1.0020 [DOI:10.3171/jns.1979.50.1.0026] [PMID]
4. Cooper DJ, Rosenfeld JV, Murray L, et al. Early decompressive craniectomy for patients with severe traumatic brain injury and refractory intracranial hypertension—a pilot randomized trial. J Crit Care.;23(3):387–93. 2008. [DOI:10.1016/j.jcrc.2007.05.002] [PMID]
5. Schreckinger M, Marion DW. Contemporary management of trau- matic intracranial hypertension: is there a role for therapeutic hypo- thermia? Neurocrit Care.;11(3):427–36. 2009. [DOI:10.1007/s12028-009-9256-2] [PMID]
6. Eisenberg HM, Frankowski RF, Contant CF, Marshall LF, Walker MD. High-dose barbiturate control of elevated intracranial pressure in patients with severe head injury. J Neurosurg.;69(1):15–23. 1988. [DOI:10.3171/jns.1988.69.1.0015] [PMID]
7. Lazaridis C, Czosnyka M. Cerebral blood flow, brain tissue oxygen, and metabolic effects of decompressive craniectomy. Neurocrit Care. 16(3):478–84. 2012. [DOI:10.1007/s12028-012-9685-1] [PMID]
8. Ho CL, Wang CM, Lee KK, Ng I, Ang BT. Cerebral oxygenation, vascular reactivity, and neurochemistry following decompressive craniectomy for severe traumatic brain injury. J Neurosurg.;108(5):943–9. 2008. [DOI:10.3171/JNS/2008/108/5/0943] [PMID]
9. Li LM, Kolias AG, Guilfoyle MR, Timofeev I, Corteen EA, Pickard JD, et al. Outcome following evacuation of acute subdural haematomas: a comparison of craniotomy with decompressive craniectomy. Acta Neurochir (Wien).;154(9):1555-61. 2012. [DOI:10.1007/s00701-012-1428-8] [PMID]
10. Weiner GM, Lacey MR, Mackenzie L, et al. Decompressive craniectomy for elevated intracranial pressure and its effect on the cumulative ischemic burden and therapeutic intensity levels after severe traumatic brain injury. Neurosurgery.66 (6):1111–8. 2010. [DOI:10.1227/01.NEU.0000369607.71913.3E] [PMID]
11. Bor-Seng-Shu E1, Figueiredo EG, Amorim RL, Teixeira MJ, Valbuza JS, de Oliveira MM, Panerai RB. Decompressive craniectomy: a meta-analysis of influences on intracranial pressure and cerebral perfusion pressure in the treatment of traumatic brain injury.J Neurosurg. Sep;117(3):589-96. 2012.
12. Patrick O. Eghwrudjakpor and Akaribari B Decompressive craniectomy following brain injury: factors important to patient outcome Libyan J Med, 5: 4620, 2010. [DOI:10.3402/ljm.v5i0.4620] [PMID]
13. Rubiano AM, Villarreal W, Hakim EJ, Aristizabal J, Hakim F, Dìez JC, et al. Early decompressive craniectomy for neurotrauma: an institutional experience. Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi= Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery: TJTES. 2009 Jan;15(1):28. [PMID] [PMCID]
14. Chen SH, Chen Y, Fang WK, Huang DW, Huang KC, Tseng SH. Comparison of craniotomy and decompressive craniectomy in severely head-injured patients with acute subdural hematoma. J Trauma.;71(6):1632-62011. [DOI:10.1097/TA.0b013e3182367b3c] [PMID]
15. Syed A, Ahmad I, Hussain M, Al-Bya F, Solaiman A Outcome following decompressive craniectomy in severe head injury: Rashid Hospital experience Pan Arab Journal Of Neurosurgery Volume 13, No. 2, P:29-35, 2009.
16. Hutchinson PJ, Corteen E, Czosnyka M, et al. Decompressive craniectomy in traumatic brain injury: the randomized multicenter RESCUEicp study (www.RESCUEicp.com). Acta Neurochir Suppl;96:17–20, 2006. [DOI:10.1007/3-211-30714-1_4]
17. Rengachary SS, Batnitzky S, Morantz RA, Arjunan K, Jeffries B. Hemicraniectomy for acute massive cerebral infarction. Neurosurgery; 8: 321_8. 1981.
18. Aarabi B, Hesdorffer DC, Ahn ES, Aresco C, Scalea TM, Eisenberg HM. Outcome following decompressive craniectomy for malignant swelling due to severe head injury. J Neurosurg.;104(4):469–79. 2006. [DOI:10.3171/jns.2006.104.4.469] [PMID]
19. Yang XF, Wen L, Shen F, et al. Surgical complications secondary to decompressive craniectomy in patients with a head injury: a series of 108 consecutive cases.ActaNeurochir.;150(12):1241–7, 2008. [DOI:10.1007/s00701-008-0145-9] [PMID]
20. Kjellberg RN, Prieto A. Bifrontal decompressive craniotomy for massive cerebral edema. J Neurosurg.;34(4):488–93. 1971. [DOI:10.3171/jns.1971.34.4.0488] [PMID]
21. Cooper DJ, Rosenfeld JV, Murray L, et al. Early decompressive craniectomy for patients with severe traumatic brain injury and refractory intracranial hypertension—a pilot randomized trial. J Crit Care.;23(3):387–93. 2008. [DOI:10.1016/j.jcrc.2007.05.002] [PMID]
22. Schreckinger M, Marion DW. Contemporary management of traumatic intracranial hypertension: is there a role for therapeutic hypothermia? Neurocrit Care.;11(3):427–36. 2009. [DOI:10.1007/s12028-009-9256-2] [PMID]
23. Malmivaara K, Kivisaari R, Hernesniemi J, Siironen J. Cost effectiveness of decompressive craniectomy in traumatic brain injuries. Eur J Neurol.;18(4):656–62. 2011. [DOI:10.1111/j.1468-1331.2010.03294.x] [PMID]
24. Stiefel MF, Heuer GG, Smith MJ, et al. Cerebral oxygenation following decompressive hemicraniectomy for the treatment of refractory intracranial hypertension. J Neurosurg.;101(2):241–7. 2004. [DOI:10.3171/jns.2004.101.2.0241] [PMID]
25. Stiver SI. Complications of decompressive craniectomy for traumatic braininjury. Neurosurg Focus.;26(6):E7. 2009. [DOI:10.3171/2009.4.FOCUS0965] [PMID]
26. Nalbach SV, Ropper AE, Dunn IF, Gormley WB. Craniectomy associated progressive extra-axial collections with treated hydrocephalus (CAPECTH): redefining a common complication of decompressive craniectomy. J ClinNeurosci.;19(9):1222–7. 2012. [DOI:10.1016/j.jocn.2012.01.016] [PMID]
27. Steyerberg EW, Mushkudiani N, Perel P, et al. Predicting outcome after traumatic brain injury: development and international validation of prognostic scores based on admission characteristics. PLoS Med;5(8):e165. 2008. [DOI:10.1371/journal.pmed.0050165] [PMID] [PMCID]
28. Marshall LF, Marshall SB, Klauber MR, et al. The diagnosis of head injury requires a classification based on computed axial tomography. J Neurotrauma. 1:S287–92. 1992.
29. Roozenbeek B, Lingsma HF, Lecky FE, et al. Prediction of outcome after moderate and severe traumatic brain injury: external validation of the International Mission on Prognosis and Analysis of Clinical Trials (IMPACT) and Corticoid Randomisation After Significant Head Injury (CRASH) prognostic models. Criti Care Med.;40(5):1609–17. 2012. [DOI:10.1097/CCM.0b013e31824519ce] [PMID] [PMCID]
30. Honeybul S, Ho KM, Lind CRP, Gillett GR. Decompressive craniectomy for diffuse cerebral swelling after trauma: long-term outcome and ethical considerations. J Trauma.;71(1):128–32. 2011. [DOI:10.1097/TA.0b013e3182117b6c] [PMID]
31. Wen L, Wang H, Wang F, et al. A prospective study of early versus late craniectomy after traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj.;25(13–14):1318–24. 2011. [DOI:10.3109/02699052.2011.608214] [PMID]
32. Albanèse J, Leone M, Alliez J-R, et al. Decompressive craniectomy for severe traumatic brain injury: evaluation of the effects at one year. Crit care Med.;31(10):2535–8. 2003. [DOI:10.1097/01.CCM.0000089927.67396.F3] [PMID]
33. Danish SF, Barone D, Lega BC, Stein SC. Quality of life after hemicraniectomy for traumatic brain injury in adults. A review of the literature. Neurosurg Focus.;26(6):E2. 2009. [DOI:10.3171/2009.3.FOCUS945] [PMID]
34. Kunze E, Meixensberger J, Janka M, Sörensen N, Roosen K. Decompressive craniectomy in patients with uncontrollable intracranial hypertension. Acta Neurochir Suppl.;71:16–8. 1998. [DOI:10.1007/978-3-7091-6475-4_5]
35. Meier U, Ahmadi S, Killeen T, Al-Zain FT, Lemcke J. Long-term outcomes following decompressive craniectomy for severe head injury. Acta Neurochir Suppl.;102:29–31. 2008. [DOI:10.1007/978-3-211-85578-2_6]
36. Olivecrona M, Rodling-Wahlström M, Naredi S, Koskinen L-OD. Effective ICP reduction by decompressive craniectomy in patients with severe traumatic brain injury treated by an ICP-targeted therapy. J Neurotrauma.;24(6):927–35. 2007. [DOI:10.1089/neu.2005.356E] [PMID]
37. Al-Jishi A, Saluja RS, Al-Jehani H, Lamoureux J. Primary or secondary decompressive craniectomy: different indication and outcome. Can J Neurol Sci.;38(4):612–20. 2011. [DOI:10.1017/S0317167100012154] [PMID]
38. Ho KM, Honeybul S, Litton E. Delayed neurological recovery after decompressive craniectomy for severe nonpenetrating traumatic brain injury. Crit Care Med.;39(11):2495–500. 2011. [DOI:10.1097/CCM.0b013e318225764e] [PMID]
39. Bohman LE, Schuster JM. Decompressive craniectomy for management of traumatic brain injury: an update. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2013 Nov 1;13(11):392. [DOI:10.1007/s11910-013-0392-x] [PMID]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:

Send email to the article author

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2022 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Iranian Journal of Neurosurgery

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb